Saving $1 billion won’t put you on TV


I understand.

Saving public money does not put a politician on TV.

It is much better to announce that you are spending $1 billion.

A new road.

A new bridge.

Some magnificent piece of infrastructure.

Probably unnecessary.

Possibly in a small town.

But located in a very interesting constituency if you want to be re-elected.

I get it.

Avoiding the need to build infrastructure is even worse.

You risk being called:

“Cheap.”

“Short-sighted.”

“Not committed to your voters.”

I get that too.

The problem is that spending for the sake of spending is terrible business.

For everyone.

I have had this conversation with officials and politicians many times.

You explain that if a corridor has a capacity problem, you may be able to defer billions in construction by introducing a toll or congestion charge.

You manage demand.

You reduce unnecessary trips at peak times.

And you raise money for the infrastructure you will eventually need.

Or for another project that is more urgent and has a better benefit-cost ratio.

The answer?

“No. People will complain that they have to pay to use the road.”

Yes.

They will pay anyway.

Through taxes.

Through public debt.

Or through the opportunity cost of not building something more valuable elsewhere.

The only question is who pays, when they pay and whether the system encourages sensible behaviour.

Apparently, these are difficult concepts to explain on TV…

Even… if my four-year-old son can understand them.

But… explaining them to voters might cost someone an election.

So it is easier to announce the billion-dollar project, smile for the photograph and cross your fingers that the thing does not blow up while you are still in office.

That is today’s reflection.

And if you work in infrastructure and need stronger arguments to challenge bad decisions before they become extremely expensive decisions, take a look to the links below.

They will not get you on TV.

But they might help you avoid wasting a billion dollars.

​THE ROOM: 15 Great Lessons of a Successful PPP Project​

​THE ROOM: The 15 Top Lessons of a PPP Project Nightmare​

​THE ROOM: How to Break Into PPPs (Without the Bullshit)​

​The ROOM: The ONLY way of doing a proper procurement process​

​THE ROOM: Back-to-Back PPP Gap Analysis Explained​

​THE ROOM: The Top 10 Errors That Kill Your PPP Deal​

​THE ROOM: How to Deal with Frustrating Lenders' Approvals in PPPs.​

​THE ROOM: THE ROOM: Minimum size for a PPP Project​

​THE ROOM: Buildings in PPP - Discussions with an African colleague​

​THE ROOM: Key Challenges and Solutions in PPP Highway Projects - 5 Clauses You Should Improve​

Or… of course, you can have them all… and many other interesting lessons in The Room.

​The Room​

PD 1: If you liked this email, don't keep it in secret and forward it to a friend. They will thank you enormously one day.

PD 2: If somebody has sent you this email and you want to receive emails like this yourself, visit vicentevalencia.com

PD 3: If you want unsubscribe, click the link below.

Vicente Valencia

Weekly insights on how to perform when it matters | High-stakes decisions. Real situations. No BS. | 👇JOIN +2k readers 👇

Read more from Vicente Valencia

In 2014. France. A true and very well documented story. The government ordered a new generation of regional trains. Beautiful trains. Modern. More comfortable. Not the smelly crap that they had when I studied in Paris… Nah… €15 billion of good trains. But someone forgot a small detail… The trains did not fit in many of the stations. You can think that those should be the basis… But no… Small details… Why bothering when we’re buying 15 billion of these things… The result? Around 1,300 platform...

Sometimes you receive funny comments and emails… Like… “Do I have to pay for a call?” as if until very recently there was not a time with no unlimited forfeits on your phone and you had to pay for EACH call… Look. I charge US$49.90 for a first call. Not enough to make me rich. At least not yet… and of course, not at that price. But the cost is still enough to make someone stop and ask: “Do I actually have a problem worth discussing?” Free calendars tend to attract three things: “Can I pick...

IBM had the best add possible: “Nobody ever got fired for buying IBM.” The logic was simple… as it was people they targeted. If it worked, fine. If it failed, nobody could blame you. You had chosen the biggest name. The sure name. Then a competitor added: “And nobody ever got promoted for buying IBM either.” Brilliant. Look. Too many advisers and providers are still selected like this. Through fear. The biggest logo. The thickest proposal. The largest team. The safe choice. Then the proposal...