|
Mega-projects don’t just overrun. They overrun lives. Ask South Africa. Medupi and Kusile were supposed to be the big solution. Two giant coal plants. Massive capex. Enough power to stop load-shedding and unlock growth. On paper? Glorious. In reality? A masterclass in how to blow up trust. Design issues. Rework. Delays measured in years, not months. Costs ballooning into the tens of billions of rand. Every extra year of delay? More load-shedding. More diesel. More businesses dying quietly. More unemployment. Everyone pays. Except the people who took the decisions. Look at the autopsy lists: Shortage of skilled labour. Poor planning. Slow decision-making. Weak contract management. Political interference. This isn’t bad luck. It’s bad governance. And here’s the part nobody wants to say out loud: When mega-projects are run inside the State, with weak contracts, soft accountability, and endless “exceptions” and “variations”, delay risk is not a risk. It’s a lifestyle. Because who really takes the hit? Not the decision-makers. They move on. New job. New board. New title. The ones who pay are: Taxpayers. Ratepayers. Small businesses that need power to survive. Families sitting in the dark explaining to their kids why the lights are off again. This is why I keep insisting that PPP is not about “bringing private money”. That’s marketing. PPP is about who bleeds when the project goes wrong. In a serious PPP, if a mega-project like Medupi or Kusile runs 5+ years late and billions over budget, someone on the private side is in real pain: Equity wiped. Penalties. No dividends for a decade. Banks breathing down their neck. Although you have to do it right... In the way these projects were actually delivered? The system absorbed the pain. Eskom struggled. The fiscus bled. Citizens paid the bill via tariffs and lost growth. So here’s the uncomfortable lesson: If you don’t define delay risk properly, if you don’t price it, if you don’t allocate it to someone who can’t escape it, you’re not “building a power station”. You’re running a social experiment in how much frustration a country can tolerate. South Africa is still paying for those experiments. In cash. In credibility. In investor confidence. And the next time someone says, “We don’t need PPPs, the State can deliver mega-projects alone,” you should calmly ask: “Okay. But when it goes 50% over budget and 7 years late… who exactly is going to bleed?” Because if the answer is “everyone and no one”, you already know how the story ends. For alternatives... take a look below: ​The top 15 Lessons of a successful project​ ​The top 15 lessons of a nightmare project​ ​Don't be embarrassed. ​ PD 1: If you liked this email, don't keep it in secret and forward it to a friend. They will thank you enormously one day. PD 2: If somebody has sent you this email and you want to receive emails like this yourself, visit vicentevalencia.com PD 3: If you want unsubscribe, click the link below. |
I talk about Personal Growth, Management, Infrastructure and More | 👇JOIN +2k readers 👇
Everyone relaxes after the contract is signed. Lawyers celebrate. Sponsors shake hands. The press release goes out. “Landmark infrastructure project.” “World-class partnership.” “Long-term value for taxpayers.” Champagne. Photos. LinkedIn posts. Etc. In 2018 one of the largest PPP contractors in the UK, Carillion, collapsed overnight. Not struggling. Not restructuring. Collapsed. Gone. A tomar por cul0. The company was involved in dozens of PPP projects across the UK and beyond. Hospitals....
I hope you had not been in one of those… A meeting with a Power Point. Around 130 slides… Yes. One. Hundred. Thirty. Graphs. Tables. Appendices explaining the appendices. The speaker? Monotone. Boring. Like a GPS giving directions in the desert. A funeral seemed a fiesta in Ibiza. Slide 14… Slide 38… Slide 79… Around slide 92 something magical happened. One of the client directors fell asleep. Not metaphorically. Actually asleep. Head tilted. Eyes closed. The kind of sleep that says: “I’ve...
How you do anything is how you do everything. Leave something half-done or poorly executed and people assume the rest of your work looks exactly the same. Maybe that’s unfair.Maybe it’s not true. Doesn’t matter. That’s the perception on the other side of the table. If you don’t show leadership in a simple information meeting, why would anyone trust you to lead when the deal gets complicated? If you perform poorly once, what are the chances the other side believes the next time will be...