We can't afford to build It. So let's pay ÂŁ3 billion to wait.


There's a fascinating way to save money in infrastructure.

Stop building.

Apparently, someone in the UK thought this was a brilliant idea.

Take HS2.

If you think the name of this railway project is spectacular, you should wait to see the cost overruns.

The Government needed to control spending.

Understandable.

So what did they do?

They delayed construction work.

Reduced annual expenditure.

And presumably celebrated the savings.

Excellent.

No money no deal…

Except… if you need a piece of infrastructure, this is an infra trap.

The decision to defer work was estimated to add between ÂŁ1.9 billion and ÂŁ3.1 billion to the project's total cost.

Yes… with b of billion.

Not my estimate.

UK Treasury says that.

So don’t kill the messenger.

Every ÂŁ1 of civil works deferred generated another ÂŁ1.25 in additional costs.

If you are not good in math, I put it to you.

You don’t spend 100 million today.

You’ll end up spending 225 million tomorrow.

Well… at least the annual budget looks better.

And the spreadsheet is green.

Naturally, nobody in construction with more than 2 days of experience could possibly have anticipated that stopping and restarting work costs money.

Demobilisation.

Remobilisation.

Lost productivity.

Disrupted supply chains.

Inflation.

Who knew?

Impossible to know…

Well...

Governments manage annual budgets.

Infrastructure projects live across decades.

And sometimes the decisions that make the first look better make the second considerably more expensive.

Of course, I’m not suggesting that governments should approve projects without proper scrutiny… I’m tired of taxes…

But… in my humble opinion…

There's a difference between responsible decision-making and endlessly postponing decisions to avoid today's uncomfortable conversation.

One protects taxpayers.

The other can send them a considerably larger bill.

These times of elections, remember this.

Different minister.

Different committee.

Same taxpayer.

Perhaps someone should introduce a KPI for that.

If you're a CEO, Project Director or Board Member facing a decision nobody wants to make, perhaps it's worth discussing it before the consequences become considerably more expensive.

Click below… Because sometimes the most expensive decision is the one nobody makes.

$49.90

1:1 The First Call

A PPP decision on your desk? Let’s talk.
A letter you need to send. A claim you need to respond to. A project issue... Read more

​

PD 1: If you liked this email, don't keep it in secret and forward it to a friend. They will thank you enormously one day.

PD 2: If somebody has sent you this email and you want to receive emails like this yourself, visit vicentevalencia.com

PD 3: If you want unsubscribe, click the link below.

Vicente Valencia

Weekly insights on how to perform when it matters | High-stakes decisions. Real situations. No BS. | 👇JOIN +2k readers 👇

Read more from Vicente Valencia

The other day, I saw another business guru sharing his wisdom. Apparently, founders and managers should delegate absolutely everything that can be done for less than $1,000 an hour. So they can focus on higher-value activities. Thousands of likes. Hundreds of comments. Everyone applauding. Sheep. Cheerleaders. It looked like an election campaign. But… don't get me wrong. You won't need to convince me about delegation. But… Delegation without control is called abdication. And there's something...

Ah… this consultancy world… it’s so funny. I just lost a mandate. The reason? Apparently, I was “too active.” Literally. Yes… this is why it is “too active” Not too expensive. Not too inexperienced. Not too busy. Too active. Infrastructure is… fascinating. Apparently, some projects need someone who doesn't ask too many questions. Doesn't challenge too many assumptions. Doesn't make too many decisions. And, above all, doesn't make anyone above them look uncomfortable. Ideally, someone who...

1959 Japan started building a high-speed railway between Tokyo and Osaka. 515 kilometres. A completely new railway system. New tracks. New trains. New technology. By October 1964, passengers were travelling at over 200 km/h. Five and a half years. No AI, folks. No digital twins. And of course, no PowerPoint presentations explaining why delivery was becoming increasingly complicated. Just a country with a clear objective. And, of course, people determined to achieve it instead of jumping onto...