|
Kenya may have explained toll-road PPPs better than many rich countries. I know. Uncomfortable. The normal script is different. Rich countries teach. Emerging markets learn. Someone says “capacity building.” Everyone nods. Beautiful. Except sometimes fiscal pressure creates better thinking than comfort. Kenya’s Rironi–Nakuru–Mau Summit Highway is interesting because the government seems to have asked the ugly question that someone needs to answer: Who pays? It’s a beautiful project… you should check the case study. Anyway. The easy model for a government was an availability-payment PPP. Private sector designs, builds, finances, operates and maintains. Government pays every year. Users do not see the bill directly. Politically cleaner. Very elegant. Very dangerous if you do not have fiscal space. No, thanks. So the project moved toward a user-pay toll PPP. Users contribute directly. Government keeps oversight. If revenues outperform, the upside can be shared or reinvested. Not perfect. Traffic forecasts lie. Truckers complain. Politics explodes. Welcome to toll roads. But the question for governments is always the same: How do we bring private capital without creating a 30-year headache for Treasury? And yes, someone will always suggest the elegant cousin: The shadow toll. No angry driver. Government pays the private partner based on traffic. Very smooth. Until Treasury realises traffic risk did not disappear. It just moved from the driver’s wallet to the public budget. This is the lesson for countries still resisting the pay per use infrastructure. Availability payment. Shadow toll. Real toll. Hybrid. Government contribution. Revenue sharing. Different tools. Different risks. Different future explanations. Risk does not disappear. It changes address. So start with: “Who really pays?” Then: “What risk are they taking?” Then the question nobody likes: “Can we defend this answer ten years from now?” Use this information at your own risk. To solve your infrastructure projects, you can click below.
​
PD 1: If you liked this email, don't keep it in secret and forward it to a friend. They will thank you enormously one day. PD 2: If somebody has sent you this email and you want to receive emails like this yourself, visit vicentevalencia.com PD 3: If you want unsubscribe, click the link below. |
Weekly insights on how to perform when it matters | High-stakes decisions. Real situations. No BS. | 👇JOIN +2k readers 👇
A young engineer arrived at his first PPP meeting. He had prepared properly. He had read the 300-page PPP guide. Then the meeting started. Availability payments. DSCR. Relief Events. Compensation Events. Senior debt. Subordinated debt. After twenty minutes, he whispered to the person next to him: “Is there a glossary?” “Yes,” the colleague replied. “It’s 68 pages.” Welcome to PPP. I was not that junior this time… but trust me… I could have been… An industry that sometimes needs 68 pages,...
In 1991, researchers at Cambridge had a supply problem. Coffee. You know how this is… Nothing can get done without a great coffee. The poor scientists trying to save the world walked down several flights of stairs to discover an empty pot. Demand was strong. Storage was inadequate. And the previous users had consumed the strategic reserve. Anyone working in infrastructure should recognise the situation… the pattern… and the claims. So they installed a camera, connected it to their computer...
A German and a Swiss engineer build a bridge… Sounds like the start of a joke. But it is real. It happened in Laufenburg. The two countries used different reference levels for measuring elevation. A 27-centimetre difference. The engineers knew about it. So they corrected it. With the wrong sign. The difference became 54 centimetres. Beautiful. Two countries working together to make one problem twice as big. There’s a lesson here… The pictures are in the internet. If you’re not sure exactly...