Infrastructure people are very strange


They say infrastructure is about delivering outcomes.

But spend five years discussing how to procure the people who might eventually deliver them.

They say experience matters.

Then appoint someone who's never delivered a project to tell those who have how to do it.

They say risk should sit with the party best able to manage it.

Then transfer everything to the contractor and act surprised when the price doubles.

They say they want innovation.

Then reject anything that wasn't done on the previous project.

They say they want certainty.

But refuse to make decisions.

They say time is money.

Then organise a two-hour meeting with fifteen people to discuss a $20,000 variation.

They say they want strong leadership.

But prefer someone who never challenges them.

They say they want accountability.

Then create a Steering Committee.

And a Subcommittee.

And an Independent Review Panel.

Just in case.

They say they value transparency.

But spend three weeks rewriting a report to make the bad news sound less bad.

They say the project is their number one priority.

Then disappear when a difficult decision needs to be made.

They say relationships are everything.

But let their lawyers do the talking.

They say they want commercial solutions.

Then send a 47-page letter explaining why nothing can be agreed.

They say they don't want disputes.

But treat every disagreement like the opening statement of an arbitration.

They say their project is unique.

Then copy the contract from a completely different country.

They say they want the best people.

Then select the cheapest adviser.

They say they trust their team.

But insist on approving every email, every letter, and be in the CC.

They say they welcome difficult questions.

Until someone asks one.

They say safety comes first.

But nobody feels safe enough to tell the CEO the truth.

They say they've been in infrastructure for twenty years.

But sometimes it's the same year repeated twenty times.

They say they're comfortable under pressure.

Then panic when a Board member asks a question that wasn't in the presentation.

They say they want to be respected.

But confuse being the loudest person in the room with being the most credible.

They say they know their numbers.

Until someone asks where they came from.

They say they don't need preparation.

Because they've done this a thousand times.

Then spend the entire meeting defending something nobody actually questioned.

They say they have nothing to prove.

But can't say three words.

"I don't know."

They say confidence comes with experience.

Yet some of the most experienced executives I've met are terrified of one thing.

Being exposed in the wrong room.

And the funny thing?

Most of these people are intelligent.

Highly qualified.

Well paid.

Some run billion-dollar projects.

Others sit on Boards overseeing billions in invested capital.

But nobody ever taught them how to handle the moment when the room turns against them.

How to respond when the client asks an impossible question.

How to challenge a powerful person without looking arrogant.

How to say no without destroying the relationship.

Or how to stop talking when the smartest thing to do is shut up.

Apparently, people in infrastructure are very strange.

They'll spend millions managing technical risks.

But almost nothing managing the personal risk of the person who has to make the decision.

That's why I created The Room.

Not another leadership course.

Not motivational nonsense.

And definitely not another PowerPoint about communication skills.

Real situations.

Difficult clients.

Uncomfortable questions.

High-stakes meetings.

And the judgement to know what to say, what not to say, and when to say nothing.

​The Room​

One day, you'll find yourself in a room where experience alone won't save you.

Better to be ready.

PD 1: If you liked this email, don't keep it in secret and forward it to a friend. They will thank you enormously one day.

PD 2: If somebody has sent you this email and you want to receive emails like this yourself, visit vicentevalencia.com

PD 3: If you want unsubscribe, click the link below.

Vicente Valencia

Weekly insights on how to perform when it matters | High-stakes decisions. Real situations. No BS. | 👇JOIN +2k readers 👇

Read more from Vicente Valencia

You probably know the story. An Arab billionaire sends his son to study in London. Naturally, he buys him a gold-plated Ferrari. A few weeks later, the son calls home. “Dad, I have a problem.” “What is it, son? Do you need more money?” “No, Dad. It's embarrassing. All my friends go to university by Underground. I'm the only idiot arriving in a gold Ferrari.” His father goes silent. Then replies: “My son, you should have told me earlier. I'm sending you £300 million immediately. Buy yourself...

Accidents aside because of lack of maintenance and incompetent managers and politicians, Spain has made great things in high-speed trains. Let’s go back in time to the good times. 1988 The country decided to build a high-speed railway between Madrid and Sevilla… or Seville. 470 kilometres. New infrastructure. New technology. A country with no previous high-speed rail experience, but willing to become a top guy. By April 1992, passengers were travelling at 250 km/h. About three and a half...

You know... I just came back from China. And I have to admit something. I was impressed. Not by the skyscrapers. Not by the technology. Not even by the infrastructure… or the great toll systems (yes, I’m a geek for them). Although, to be fair, a country that added almost 2,900 km of high-speed railway in a single year deserves some credit. Some countries struggle to build 3 km of metro without a parliamentary inquiry, a budget revision and three changes of government. No. What impressed me...