|
I’m a PPP freak. You know… I heard in the news that Ghana will keep 70% of the toll revenue. Excellent. Seventy per cent is a very impressive number. Particularly before anyone asks: Seventy per cent of what? Ghana’s Parliament recently approved a 20-year PPP to introduce electronic tolling across 66 locations. The Government receives 70% of gross toll revenue. The concessionaire receives 30%. Great for a press release, some pictures and ceremonial pats in the back. Percentages are seductive. They look precise. They fit nicely into headlines. Especially, online press. Now, imagine I offer you 70% of… let’s say… a restaurant. Would you accept? Before you say a word, let me add a few details. The restaurant loses money. The kitchen needs replacing. Nobody knows how many customers will come. You pay for maintenance. And the bank gets paid before you do… as usual. Still excited about your 70%? Unless you love self-flagellation… I guess you are not that much anymore… And that’s the issue with the revenue-sharing agreements. Before celebrating the split, I would want to know: Who pays for the system? Who carries demand risk? What happens if drivers avoid the tolls? Who absorbs collection leakage and enforcement failures? Which costs are paid before revenue is distributed? Who funds major maintenance and future upgrades? And what happens when the private party’s 30% is no longer enough to keep the arrangement bankable? You’d say that all this is logical… but if so… it’s because you haven’t met the “best advisors” a government I advise found on toll matters… Hopefully for the government, Ghana’s agreement apparently uses gross revenue, which is considerably better than a vague promise of 70% of “profits.” But even 70% of gross revenue does not answer the most important question: Does the underlying model actually work? A generous percentage of an unrealistic forecast is not value. It is a very attractive number inside a spreadsheet. This happens everywhere. A government negotiates a larger revenue share. An investor negotiates a higher ownership percentage. A contractor accepts a bigger bonus pool. A shareholder wins a larger share of “savings.” Everyone focuses on the numerator. Nobody checks whether the denominator exists. Before You Send the board paper, press release or draft agreement, follow the money all the way to the bottom. Use this information at your own risk... and the link below as well...
​
PD 1: If you liked this email, don't keep it in secret and forward it to a friend. They will thank you enormously one day. PD 2: If somebody has sent you this email and you want to receive emails like this yourself, visit vicentevalencia.com PD 3: If you want unsubscribe, click the link below. |
Weekly insights on how to perform when it matters | High-stakes decisions. Real situations. No BS. | 👇JOIN +2k readers 👇
1993. Argentina, the losers of the last World Cup. They are pros in Economics. This is why they signed a 30-year PPP with a nine-year business plan. What can get wrong? Nobody knew it was nine years. That was the problem. Or at least, one of them. The project was Aguas Argentinas. At the time, it was the largest water concession in the world. You know… Argentinos tend to exaggerate… a little bit… specially in front of the referee… More than eight million customers. Thirty years. Serious...
Governments love competitive tension. They spend 18 months creating it. Market soundings. RFQs. RFPs. Best and Final Offers… or Optimization Phase in some places… Lawyers, financial models, technical advisers, probity officers… and 143 versions of a contract called FINAL. I love this game! Then they select the preferred bidder. Sign the contract. Open the champagne. Take a photograph wearing hard hats. Book holidays to Fiji. And kill the competition. Because the first auction is over. The...
Private investors love traffic risk. Especially when the government carries it. India wants to revive private highway investment. Its traditional BOT model had collapsed. Less than 5% of highway projects got someone signing a BOT contract. So the government changed the model. Traffic-risk sharing. Revenue support. Government buyback. Suddenly, private investors are interested again. Funny how that happens. Let’s be fair. Sharing traffic risk may be exactly the right decision. Traffic is...