Congratulations. Your bridge is back. Bring ÂŁ12 million.


Ah…

Time flies and PPPs finally arrive to the end… like a terrible elected leader term…

Getting your infrastructure back at the end of a concession sounds lovely.

Like removing Pedro Sanchez from office.

The debt is paid.

The concessionaire leaves.

You get the asset.

Like collecting your car after lending it to a friend.

Except your friend has had it for 25 years.

And “the tyres are fine” means they are still technically round.

Oups…

Do you remember the terms of the return?

2018

Severn Crossings, between England and Wales.

Highways England took over their operation and maintenance as the crossings returned to public ownership.

Lovely…

But before the handover, the Department for Transport had already told Parliament that resurfacing the original bridge after the concession was expected to cost around ÂŁ12 million.

What??

The reports though said that the crossings were in relatively good condition.

Even audits confirmed that the concessionaire maintained them in accordance with… “its obligations”.

So you could receive a bridge maintained in accordance with the contract…

…and still need £12 million for resurfacing, the following day?

Congratulations for the welcome pack.

Look.

This is why I don’t stop repeating myself on this.

Handback deserves slightly more attention than:

We’ll deal with that when the time comes.

That sentence is wonderful.

Especially for the people who will have retired before “the time” arrives.

For the executive still sitting in the chair, things are less relaxing.

What happens if everyone agrees that the asset is “fine”…

…but everyone means something different?

The engineer means it works today.

The investor means the contractual obligation has been met.

The incoming operator means it needs replacing next year.

And the Board means:

Why are we only hearing about this now?

Oups…

Suddenly, a clause nobody wanted to discuss at financial close has become the most exciting document in the building.

Whispers in every corner.

And whatsapp groups to discuss about it.

Lawyers, especially, love excitement.

They charge by the hour.

I spent around six years as CEO of the Pūhoi–Warkworth PPP in New Zealand.

That gives you plenty of opportunities to read a contract and think:

Yes. I can see how this could become somebody’s very expensive problem.

In course below, I use that project’s handback regime to examine nine lessons.

Because the time to understand what a handback clause will actually do is while you can still act on it.

Before the surveys.

Before the arguments.

Before somebody forwards you a replacement programme with:

Please confirm budget approval.

If you lead, oversee or invest in a PPP, this deserves a place on your desk.

Preferably before the invoice does.

​THE ROOM: 9 Lessons From A So-So Hand-Back Regime - P2Wk Project NZ​

P.S. Your contract has an expiry date.

Your bridge hasn’t read it.

PD 1: If you liked this email, don't keep it in secret and forward it to a friend. They will thank you enormously one day.

PD 2: If somebody has sent you this email and you want to receive emails like this yourself, visit vicentevalencia.com

PD 3: If you want unsubscribe, click the link below.

Vicente Valencia

Weekly insights on how to perform when it matters | High-stakes decisions. Real situations. No BS. | 👇JOIN +2k readers 👇

Read more from Vicente Valencia

You know the IBM ad: “Nobody has been fired for choosing IBM”. Well… in procurement there are ads like that. “We didn’t just go for the cheapest.” Lovely. Everyone nods. Someone writes “quality” in the minutes. Your career feels protected. Unfortunately, the project hasn’t read the minutes. Take Scotland’s Parliament building at Holyrood. In January 1999, three final candidates were competing to become construction manager. Bovis came out comfortably ahead at interview. 82 points out of 100....

A few days ago, I talked about the smallest PPP in the world. It’s in Poland. 12.000€. Probably quite unknown. There are another one… this time famous. Small building. Small investment. Small transaction costs. Sorry. That last one was a joke. Scotland. 2002 Audit Scotland reviewed six school PFI projects. For Glasgow, it reported around £12 million in combined public and private sector set-up and advisory costs. Against £212 million in construction. For West Lothian? Around £2 million....

Before you tell a difficult public client: “You can’t do this without me.” Consider a small building in Sydney. White roof. Quite photogenic. You may have seen it. February 1966. Jørn Utzon, the architect of the small building, met the NSW Minister for Public Works, Davis Hughes. There were unpaid fees. A dispute over funding for prototypes. And a relationship that had already gone thoroughly to hell. Utzon threatened to quit. Hughes replied: “You are always threatening to quit...” And both...